Alternative thinking for the ARC | Letter

At this point, we don’t know if the center will be $40 million or $80 million. But, we do know that this tax will last forever. It may only cost a few hundred or a thousand per year for some homeowners, but over 30 years, this can mean tens of thousands of tax dollars for homeowners.

At this point, we don’t know if the center will be $40 million or $80 million. But, we do know that this tax will last forever. It may only cost a few hundred or a thousand per year for some homeowners, but over 30 years, this can mean tens of thousands of tax dollars for homeowners.

What we have been told so far:
  • Council invested $500,000 to evaluate potential public and private sites
  • Seven to nine acres of private land for the ARC will cost up to $20 million dollars
  • The ARC design cost could range as high as another $5 million.
  • Building cost?  We don’t know. Yet, we are being asked to vote on this unknown amount for an unlimited period of time.

My other concern is that city and/or state agencies sometimes build facilities that are far more expensive than the private sector. On occasion, they run over budget and over time. For instance, consider the projected cost of $40 million to $80 million then look at these Aquatic/Recreation Centers designed, built and operated by the YMCA in Washington. These guys know what they’re doing – because they have been doing it for 100 years.

The YMCA is building a 47,500-square-foot facility in Stanwood. Projected cost is $22 million, community involvement is $17 million; the Y built a 110,000-square-foot facility in Sumner for $35 million, community involvement $16.4 million (land donated by city); the Y built a 85,000-square-foot facility in Haselwood for $22 million, community involvement $12 million (land donated by government); the Y built a 74,765-square-foot facility in Gig Harbor for $24 million, community involvement $16 million (land purchased by the YMCA).

And a ‘good to know fact’ – Kirkland isn’t the first city to lose a school pool. Stanwood did too … and the Y is in the process of building a facility to meet the school’s need and the general public’s need.

This site will have a competitive pool, a leisure pool with river and a big whirlpool.

We don’t need a Metropolitan Park District with a range of 25 cents to 75 cents per $1,000 for an endless period of time. We need the YMCA with their beautiful designs and proven operational knowledge. Take a minute and look at the pictures of these sites. It will blow your mind. They look like resorts.
  • gordon-family-ymca[bcradesign.com]
  • gig-harbor-ymca[bcradesign.com]
  • haselwood-ymca[bcradesign.com]

Bonus point – if you join one Y – you join them all.  If you need a work out close to home, close to school or close to work. You’re golden.

Why not the “Y”?

Dawn Kerrins, Kirkland