St. Clair ignores the freedom of light rail

Last week’s column by Scott St. Clair (criticizing light rail) was way wide of the mark.

Last week’s column by Scott St. Clair (criticizing light rail) was way wide of the mark.

Light rails and public transit in general do not limit the movement of people. They actually remove the limits.

I went to a university in Austria for a year and found the combination of the big trains and local/regional light rail in Europe incredibly liberating. For the entire year I was there, I never had to get in one single car. Their system allowed me to visit Budapest, Prague, Paris, Munich, Vienna, Florence, Rome, Berlin, Montpellier, Amsterdam, Brussels and more on a whim.

No planes or cars needed.

And to get to closer places, they had light rails and electric buses that went nearly everywhere. Many people there do own cars, but use them more for fun and larger errands instead of living in them; or for them, depending on how you look at it.

I’m limited here. If I want to go somewhere, chances are I need to drive and find parking. I do love my little classic car and will not get rid of it. But I would use a rail into Seattle or Bellevue or Redmond in a heartbeat.

I would use any form of shorter transit inside Kirkland too, if any were to ever exist. A little bus from my neighborhood to a farmer’s market would be great; or to my daughter’s school even better; or a martini night with the girls would be cake icing.

That argument about light rail being against the concepts of our founding fathers by limiting our rights makes even less sense than his argument that global warming isn’t real because it’s cold where he lives.

~Dana Fos, Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Family Literacy Night was a huge success | Letter

I am writing today to say how excited I was to read… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading