Advocating a scientific approach to transit

Dear Editor,

Dear Editor,

(In regard to a potential commuter rail line along the BNSF corridor) I would like to advocate for the “none of the above” option; not one more cent for either roads or transit until we have a comprehensive mathematical model of all the local trip destinations and origins, of all the people, freight and parcel. The model must include all factors, such as time of day, etc., and the supply/demand curve for what people are willing to pay. And, it must incorporate society’s goals for less fuel, less CO2, greater safety, less wasted time, etc.

All those things can be expressed mathematically, and the Puget Sound Regional Council and transportation industry know it. But these transportation decisions are being made on the basis of power politics instead of a fair competition between transportation choices, based on empirical data.

The power groups don’t even want to admit an algebraic equation exists. Because, when you crank the handle, the decision will come out favoring a particular design. The cost of land-use decisions among residential areas and distant downtowns, shopping malls or aircraft plants would be exposed. The waste of empty buses, empty trucks and taxis, and a postal monopoly would be exposed. The waste of time would be exposed.

This region has thousands of engineers who could design a marvelous transportation system — if it’s designed on a scientific basis instead of pressure groups like the construction industry, transit bureaucrats, auto industry and the people in Houghton (Eastside Trail Advocates), Medina, and Montlake.

The higher-order policy decision is: How will the human race make its design decisions — by power politics or by principles.

~Todd Boyle, Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Family Literacy Night was a huge success | Letter

I am writing today to say how excited I was to read… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading