A different take on free market health care

The letter by Jeff Jared (Kirkland Reporter, Dec. 25) expounding the need for “free market” health care needs a response.

Mr. Jared wants to “unshackle” health insurance. Requiring insurance coverage for birth control or mental health, he writes, makes the plan a “Cadillac.” He wants people to choose such coverage only if they are fairly certain they will need the service (does anyone feel the first “sniffles” of an oncoming schizophrenia attack?).

The net effect is a drastically reduced pool of buyers resulting in skyrocketing premiums, which reduces the number of people able to afford the service, which jacks up the premium further, and on and on. It seems Mr. Jared needs to brush up on the basics of insurance.

Several other points are listed. Among the more startling are: private accreditation of medical/nursing schools, reducing/downgrading the FDA, selling antibiotics OTC and disallowing individual deductions for medical expenses. Each of these would have severe adverse consequences. Together they would lead to a catastrophe.

Just imagine going to your doctor and seeing a framed medical degree from Trump University on the wall, or having to decide whether to use an obscenely expensive “super” drug, touted as a cure for cancer, that was allowed to bypass the FDA. Misuse of prescription antibiotics is bad enough already. Antibiotics made available OTC is a nothing but a deadly fast track recipe for creating new untreatable super bugs. And who do you think is hurt when tax deduction for medical expenses, such as it is, is entirely eliminated? The wealthy?

One final thing: On the face of it, buying health insurance across state lines does sound good. Until one looks into it a little deeper. There is a reason why services can be offered cheaper in certain states. It’s called lack of regulations. I hope you like having deep conversations on medical issues with an IVR machine. Don’t look at our state attorney general’s office for help when things go south.

More in Letters to the Editor

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading

Don’t ban guns, ban government schools | Letter to the editor

Public schools have become impersonal, sterile and monolithic — like most government institutions.

Will council reduce taxes | Letter to the editor

Property tax bills have gone up 18.8 percent; the RTA vehicle registration tax has more than doubled.

Youth: You have power | Letter to the editor

A letter to young people protesting issues of violence.

We need national legislation with a global impact | Letter to the editor

The “Ways to reduce your energy usage“ letter (Feb. 15) contains common… Continue reading

Ways to reduce your energy usage | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland Reporter’s carbon-tax cartoon (Feb. 9) shows a very fatalistic view… Continue reading