In response to Neil Goldberg’s recent letter about Martin Morgan, what Mr. Goldberg fails to mention is that the city has had Mr. Morgan in court more than a dozen times and Mr. Morgan has won each and every time. He has had to spend all of his money defending baseless charges leveled by the code enforcement office.

If it weren’t for the city, that property would have been developed and would be producing far more tax revenue.

The real issue is why the city has been relentless in pursuing Mr. Morgan. Could it be his complaints against the Building Department for the clear cut lot and three-story building the department approved? Then that same department refused to enforce the double tree buffer? One has to wonder.

Bill Henkens, Kirkland