Health care bill violates privacy rights

The new you-gotta-buy-health-insurance law violates privacy rights found in Article I, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution, and in the federal 1st, 4th, 5th and 9th Amendments.

The feds shouldn’t be able to force me to buy a private good, namely, health insurance. I should be able to opt out of the socialized health insurance pool.

This privacy argument against the individual mandate is in addition to the 10th Amendment argument against it (overbearing federal law violates states rights), and the Commerce Clause (Art. I, Sect. 8, para. 3) argument that there’s no authority or constitutional grant of power for the feds to do this.

Democratic Obama care and Republican Romney care (Massachusetts) require everyone to buy health insurance (except the poor, and Christian Scientists, whose religious beliefs oppose modern medical treatment).

This pro-privacy view opposing the you-must-buy clause is summed up in Justice Cardozo’s famous quote in Schloendorf v. Society of New York Hospital (1914): “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his body.”

No law may unreasonably interfere with a person’s right to be let alone, and so held the U.S. Supreme Court in Papachristou v. Jacksonville in 1972 and the Washington State Supreme Court in Seattle v. Drew in 1967. The federal mandate violates two specific sub-rights that make up the right to privacy, or the “right to be let alone.” They are the rights to bodily integrity, and to making important personal decisions.

The right to bodily integrity stems from Olmstead v. United States, a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court case; Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942) – forced sterilization of criminals not allowed; Rochin v. California (1952) – forced stomach pumping not allowed; Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) – right of unmarrieds to get birth control; and maybe the most famous U.S. Supreme Court case ever, Roe v. Wade (1973) – right to abortion.

The right to make personal decisions stems from Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) (upholding parents’ rights to decide that a foreign language can be taught to their kids); Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) (upholding parents’ right to decide that their child can go to a private school); Whalen v. Roe (1977) – affirming the rights to marriage, procreation, family relationships, child rearing and education); Loving v. Virginia (1967) – upholding the right to inter-racially marry.

And it clearly is an important decision whether to get health insurance, and whether you should register your body with the state. This kind of personal decision implicates the aforesaid privacy cases that should be used to strike down as unconstitutional this new health bill’s mandate that all citizens buy health insurance.

Jeff E. Jared is an attorney and political writer in Kirkland who writes from a libertarian and law-and-economics perspective.

In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

More in Opinion

Federal Way resident Bob Roegner is a former mayor of Auburn. Contact
Behind the appointment of King County’s new sheriff | Roegner

King County Executive Dow Constantine had three finalists to choose from when… Continue reading

Avi Goodman. Courtesy of EvergreenHealth.
Understanding and treating arthritis

By Avi Goodman, MD, Orthopedic Surgeon at EvergreenHealth Orthopedic & Sports Care… Continue reading

Robert Whale can be reached at
Roe v. Wade and the road we have been down before | Whale’s Tales

I have been thinking a lot lately about the Prohibition Era in… Continue reading

Robert Whale can be reached at
Here’s a theory on why people embrace all those crazy theories | Whale’s Tales

Not so long ago, one could have called me a dyed-in-the-wool, hard-core… Continue reading

Federal Way resident Bob Roegner is a former mayor of Auburn. Contact
Police misconduct is getting expensive for taxpayers | Roegner

More cities and counties are avoiding trials and settling with the families… Continue reading

Code Purple Team photo. Courtesy of Sandra Maffeo.
LWHS Robotics attend World Championship in Texas

The team was invited to compete in Houston, TX from April 20 to 23.

Don C. Brunell is a business analyst, writer and columnist. He retired as president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization, and lives in Vancouver. He can be contacted at
Seattle World’s Fair highlighted electric transportation network | Brunell

Seattle’s 1962 World’s Fair was awe-inspiring. It previewed developments that would improve… Continue reading

Federal Way resident Bob Roegner is a former mayor of Auburn. Contact
Lawsuit may have chilling effect on effort to reduce homelessness | Roegner

Responding to the regional homeless challenge isn’t easy and comes with its… Continue reading

Federal Way resident Bob Roegner is a former mayor of Auburn. Contact
King County prosecutor race is the one to watch | Roegner

The race to replace retiring Dan Satterberg as King County prosecutor is… Continue reading

Federal Way resident Bob Roegner is a former mayor of Auburn. Contact
King County’s new inquest rules become part of new system | Roegner

Since 1854, before Washington was a territory, inquests have been required whenever… Continue reading