United States is a health care outlier | Letter

The United States finishes last among the world’s wealthiest 11 nations when it comes to health care.

Jeff Jared strikes again. Mr. Jared is vehemently opposed to socialized medicine, (Kirkland Reporter, Dec. 25, 2017) a medical approach that has a proven track record — and a better track record — in a majority of western, industrialized nations. Don’t take my word for it. According to a report published by the Commonwealth Fund in 2014, the United States finishes last among the world’s wealthiest 11 nations. Dare I say, “Dead last?”

Here is the simple truth: The United Kingdom, Switzerland, Sweden, Australia, Germany, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, France and Canada all surpass the United States in almost every health care category, especially per capita cost. While Americans spent $8,500 dollars per capita (2011), UK residents spent $3,400 dollars for much better health care. Even more startling, everyone in the UK is covered. Everyone. Even visitors to the UK should they need health care. The UK has universal health care, as do nine of the other 10 nations cited in the study. The United States is the outlier.

So let’s summarize. The United States doesn’t have universal health care and ranks dead last while its citizens pay considerably more. That’s no way to run a health care system. And Mr. Jared’s “we-gotta-keep-the-free-market-system” approach offers no solutions at all.

For instance, he suggests legalizing “bare bones health insurance” (Point 1). What would it insure? What wouldn’t be covered? Would I dare to get diabetes? Asthma? Cancer? None of us gets to choose our diseases. Which of us plans our slips, our falls or our accidents?

And of course, “de-credentializing” (Point 10) won’t bring us better doctors or nurses — only unqualified ones. And when we are ill served by bad health care providers, Mr. Jared advocates “limited liability” (Point 9).

Finally, Mr. Jared would rescind the mandate requiring employers to provide health care (Point 3), something that almost every employee I have ever known values. He would rather individuals use a medical savings account (Point 6). This suggestion flies in the face of decades of wage stagnation and a growing number of low- and middle-income families who simply wouldn’t be able to put enough — if any — money aside.

No. Our goals should be 1) universal coverage for all; 2) coverage that covers everyone for literally everything; and 3) coverage that is less expensive because the profit motive has been removed. Ten other wealthy nations have already done it. Those are the facts.

John R. Scannell,

Sammamish

More in Letters to the Editor

In the hands of voters | Letter

Every voter in the state of Washington should be furious with the… Continue reading

No reason to delay | Letter

I’m so bloody tired of this stupid talking point of “impeachment doesn’t… Continue reading

Critical time for the planet | Letter

This is in response to Mr. Eirich’s letter on May 17 regarding… Continue reading

A step backward | Letter

Rep. Suzan DelBene announced in her email newsletter that she “proudly voted”… Continue reading

A tone deaf Legislature | Letter

The headline should have been “Legislators stole $900 M for the affluent… Continue reading

Thank you Hiruko | Letter

Ashley Hiruko’s detailed story (“Susan’s quest for justice and the civil legal… Continue reading

An eye opener | Letter

I was quite taken by the article “Susan’s quest for justice, the… Continue reading

Thank you residents | Letter

We would like to thank the residents of Kirkland for their generous… Continue reading

The saga of Trump | Letter

Here is another installment in the saga of Trump. Just because Trump’s… Continue reading

An ineffective leader | Letter

Gov. Jay Inslee was an ineffective member of Congress, as well as… Continue reading

Changing habits | Letter

Thank you for including the waste reduction article in the May 10… Continue reading

On constitutional taxes | Letter

Is this new graduated state real estate excise tax (REET) constitutional? The… Continue reading