No thanks to creepy courts

Last year, a bill (SB 5598/HB 2117) was introduced to the Washington state legislature regarding family visitation rights. This bill is sponsored by several legislators in Kirkland, including Sen. Kuderer, Rep. McBride, Rep. Goodman, Rep. Springer. It must be very important to them, because it has been reintroduced no less than four times over the last year, most recently on Monday, Jan. 8.

Not content to have courts merely resolve custody disputes or abuse in dysfunctional families, this bill gives power to county courts to manage healthy children who live in functional homes with both parents in a stable relationship. How? According to the bill, any blood relative – second cousins, half-relatives and definitely including that creepy uncle – who feels they have a “mutuality of interest and affection” toward your child, may file a petition for visitation rights.

The court is ordered to weigh the “love, affection, and strength” of that relationship against your “reasons for denying visitation.” Then, the judge decides what is in the “best interest of the child.”

Why is it the county’s business to resolve family disagreements on whom you allow to visit your child when you have full parental rights? I personally can’t figure that out, but I know plenty of friends who are trying to avoid nosy family members who think they know how to better take care of their children. I don’t want to have my tax dollars wasted on creepy uncles dragging those friends into court.

David Johnson,

Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Family Literacy Night was a huge success | Letter

I am writing today to say how excited I was to read… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading