Letters to the Editor

Metro has the wrong priorities | Letter

Letters to the editor - Reporter file art
Letters to the editor
— image credit: Reporter file art

As a Metro rider for many years for commuting and getting around, Metro does some things right. The routes I ride have good schedules, most are on time and have good capacity.

Metro sometimes does it wrong.

Wrong - Priority for service cuts. The service cut priorities are backwards because they do not take into account the impacts to people or places served.

Wrong - Service cuts eliminate service from so many places. Unless you live in Seattle, Metro is no longer an option. Kirkland will lose service to the Lake Washington Institute of Technology for example.

Fix this.

The priorities should be:

Priority 1: Maintain service to as many areas as possible (2-3 times daily service is better than no times a day service).

Priority 2: Maintain commuter service.

Priority 3: Eliminate Rapidride.

Priority 4: Restructure a network only in Seattle (more buses going most places would be the biggest opportunity for route efficiency.

I have to ask - when was the last time some of our elected leaders actually rode Metro?

Tom Rovegno, Kirkland

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 31 edition online now. Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates