Judge rules local governments can regulate marijuana businesses

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson. - Reporter file photo
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson.
— image credit: Reporter file photo

The following is a release from the Washington State Attorney General's Office:

Pierce County Superior Court before Judge Ronald Culpepper ruled Friday that nothing in Initiative 502 overrides local governments’ preexisting authority to regulate local businesses, including marijuana businesses, through zoning or otherwise. The ruling could set a precedent for all cities in Washington state.

Because the court agreed with the Washington State Attorney General's opinion that I-502 did not require local governments to allow marijuana businesses, the court never had to address whether federal law preempts I-502. This allows I-502 to continue to be implemented.

“My office aggressively worked to uphold the will of the voters,” said Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson. “Today’s ruling affirms the opinion of my office earlier this year and allows Initiative 502 to continue to be implemented in Washington state. As I have said from the beginning, the drafters of Initiative 502 could have required local jurisdictions to allow the sale of recreational marijuana.  It could have been done in a single sentence, but it was not.  Now it is up to the Legislature to decide whether to require local governments to allow for the sale of marijuana.”

The Attorney General's Office (AGO) intervened in this case to uphold the will of the voters, defend I-502 and ensure its proper interpretation. The AGO did not represent the plaintiffs or the City of Fife. Rather, the AGO was an additional party to the lawsuit.

The American Civil Liberties Union also intervened to represent several potential marijuana businesses in other jurisdictions.

The plaintiffs in this case sought to open marijuana businesses in Fife despite the city’s ban on such businesses. A formal opinion released by the AGO in January 2014 concluded that, as drafted, I-502 does not prevent cities and counties from banning marijuana businesses.

The city argued that it is not required to allow such businesses under I-502. The city also argued that if I-502 does require it to allow such businesses, then I-502 is preempted by federal law. “Federal preemption” is when federal law is determined to override state law.


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the Oct 21
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates