- About Us
- Local Savings
- Green Editions
- Legal Notices
- Weekly Ads
Connect with Us
How did 1st District representatives for Kirkland vote?
The following is a recap of how Kirkland legislators from the 1st District recently voted on several bills and resolutions (according to washingtonvotes.org) during the 2014 session.
Senate Bill 6523, Expanding higher education opportunities for certain students. Passed the Senate on January 31, 2014 by a vote of 35-10.
This bill would add students who receive federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) status to the eligibility for the State Needs Grant (SNG) tuition assistance program. DACA status applies to children who were brought to the United States by their parents illegally. The bill, called the "Real Hope Act,” would make DACA status students eligible for the SNG if they completed the full senior year of high school and obtained a diploma or its equivalent at a Washington public or private high school; lived in Washington for at least three years immediately prior to receiving the diploma or its equivalent; and continuously lived in the state after receiving the diploma or its equivalent and until being admitted to a public institution of higher education. This bill seeks to accomplish the same overall goals as HB 1817, the "Washington State Dream Act," which was passed by the House on the first day of this year’s legislative session.
Yes: Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe.
House Bill 1313, Establishing minimum standards for paid sick and safe leave from employment. Passed the House on January 29. 2014 by a vote of 52-45.
The bill would require employers in Washington State with more than four full-time equivalent employees to provide paid leave to employees for: (1) specified medical reasons relating to the employee's or a family member's health; (2) reasons permitted under existing law requiring unpaid leave for purposes related to domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking; or (3) closure of the employee's place of business. An employer must compensate an employee who uses sick and safe leave at the same hourly rate and with the same benefits as the employee would have earned during the time leave is taken. No compensation would be required for lost tips or commissions and compensation is only required for hours that the employee was scheduled to work.
Yes: Rep. Luis Moscoso and Rep. Derek Stanford.
House Bill 1279, Allowing motor voter pre-registration for sixteen and seventeen year olds. Passed the House on January 27, 2014 by a vote of 54-42.
This bill would authorize the Department of Licensing (DOL) to pre-register a person to vote who is at least 16 years of age at the time he or she applies for a driver's license or identicard. The information contained in the voter pre-registration application would be exempt from public inspection and copying. Current law requires the DOL to provide voter registration services to persons applying for or renewing a driver's license or identicard if they are United States citizens and are at least 18 years old on or before the next election. Eight states currently allow pre-registration of individuals younger than 18, including Oregon and California.
Yes: Luis Moscoso and Stanford.
House Bill 1267, Changing voter registration deadlines. Passed the House on January 27, 2014 by a vote of 59-37.
This bill would change the time period for online voter registration from 29 to 11 days before a primary or general election; the time period for in-person registration from 8 to 11 days before an election; and the time period for mail-in registrations from 29 to 28 days before an election. An earlier version of the bill would have allowed on-line registration up to eight days before an election, and in-person registration at a county auditor’s office until 5:00 p.m. on the day of an election. County auditors, however, testified in Committee hearings that same-day registration would place too great a burden on their offices. The bill was amended on the floor to its current content when it previously passed the House during the 2013 legislative session.
Yes: Moscoso and Stanford.
House Bill 1413, Enacting the Washington voting rights act of 2013. Passed the House on January 27, 2014 by a vote of 53-43.
This bill would prohibit elections in Washington’s political subdivisions that are applied in a way that denies a protected class an equal opportunity to elect candidates of its choice or to influence the outcome of an election, Protected class means a class of voters who are members of a race, color, or language minority group. To avoid any potential violations of voting rights, the bill would authorize political subdivisions of the state to change from at-large to district-based election systems, or to redraw districts in existing district-based systems. A violation of voting rights would be shown by demonstrating that the elections in the political subdivision have polarized voting and members of a protected class lack an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or to influence election outcomes. Polarized voting means voting in which there is a difference in the choice of candidates or other electoral choices that are preferred by voters in a protected class, and the choices that are preferred by voters in the rest of the electorate. Remedies include court-imposed and supervised redistricting.
Yes: Moscoso and Stanford.
SOURCE: WashingtonVotes.org is a project of the Washington Policy Center. Please visit www.WashingtonVotes.org and check out our new Olympia news service, Washingtonvotes.org News, which is featured on the home page. We're also on Facebook and Twitter, at washingtonvotes.org.