News

Sen. McAuliffe introduces plan for class size reduction

State Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe, D-Bothell, of Legislative District 1 - Contributed
State Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe, D-Bothell, of Legislative District 1
— image credit: Contributed

Last week, the Washington State Supreme Court instructed the Legislature to develop a detailed plan for fully funding K-12 education under the McCleary decision. This week, Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe, who represents north Kirkland residents, responded to that call for action with SB 6108, legislation that would detail a plan to implement class size reduction for grades K-3, as required by the Supreme Court.

“The Supreme Court was unequivocal – we must act now,” said McAuliffe, D-Bothell and ranking Democratic member on the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Education committee. “Our kids have been in overcrowded classrooms for too long and further delay is unacceptable. In 2012, Washington was ranked as having the fourth most crowded classrooms of any state in the nation. Research shows that small class sizes are one of the most effective investments we can make in a child’s future, especially in the early grades, and passing this bill will help secure our children’s success and continue our progress towards fully funding education by 2018.”

Washington currently funds class sizes in grades K-3 for most classrooms at a level of 24.1 students per teacher in high poverty schools and 25.23 students per teacher in non-high poverty schools. A bill passed in 2010, requires that the state fund K-3 class sizes of 17 students per teacher for grades K-3 in all schools by the 2017-18 school year. While current law simply sets an end goal of 17 students per teacher, the new bill lays out year-by-year how the state can reduce class sizes each year to reach the 2018 goal.

“The Supreme Court told us that it isn’t enough to have a goal – we have to outline the steps along the way to get there, too,” said McAuliffe. “Students, parents, teachers and school districts need to be able to count on the state and know that we’re going to deliver what we promise, and putting this kind of schedule into law will hold the legislature accountable. This is exactly the kind of plan that the Supreme Court told us in plain English that we have to have.”

The Supreme Court instructed the Legislature to produce a report by April 30 of this year outlining how it plans to reach full funding of basic education by 2018, including the state’s responsibility to fund teacher compensation, which carries a total expected price tag of approximately $5 billion. The bill represents a plan for implementing funding of class size reduction.

“We know smaller class sizes are key for closing the opportunity gap for struggling children and will help students graduate ready for college or a career,” said McAuliffe. “The root of our opportunity gap is evident when we look at the results in math and literacy for disadvantaged kids entering kindergarten. Our littlest learners who struggle need small class sizes to provide them with the individual academic support that they need to succeed.”

For school districts that cannot pass capital bonds, the bill would set up a capital budget grant program to appropriate money for school construction to help alleviate capacity pressure.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Aug 29 edition online now. Browse the archives.