Proposition 1 will focus on property crimes | Letter

Kirkland is proposing an important measure to advance public safety services in the city. The measure contains several items that specifically address safety concerns we have heard from the community. One such proposal is the establishment of a police pro-act unit to help solve property crimes. A pro-act unit and the hiring of additional patrol officers were two of several important recommendations identified in our Police Strategic Plan, which guides investments to address the city’s long-term public safety needs.

Since 2010, Kirkland has added 34 police officers and $9.2 million in funding to the department in response to annexation and the continued growth of our city, but we continue to be unable to allocate enough dedicated, on-going funding to reconstitute the pro-act unit that we had to eliminate during the Great Recession. Kirkland’s Proposition 1 will provide that funding.

With most of our on-duty police officers dedicated to responding to 911 calls in a reactive manner and our small detective squad focused on important person crimes, there is little additional time or resources to focus on property crimes. At the same time, largely due to the growing opioid epidemic, property crimes like home burglaries, vehicle break-ins, shoplifting, mail theft and identity theft are on the rise throughout our region. A proactive (pro-act) police unit will be able to focus on trends or commonalities in property crimes and provide the needed capabilities to begin a community-focused preventive policing program, while also coordinating with other jurisdictions to investigate regional rings of property thieves that travel from one city to the next.

Given the increasing need to address property crimes and the outstanding success of the previous pro-act unit, we believe that Kirkland’s Proposition 1 is fundamental to maintaining the quality of life for our city’s residents and ensures that our community invests wisely in enhancing our public safety services.

Please vote for yes on Kirkland’s Proposition 1 on your November ballot.

Penny Sweet, Toby Nixon, Jon Pascal

City of Kirkland Council Public Safety Committee

Letter submitted using no city resources

More in Letters to the Editor

Arguments for sweets at school | Letter

Did you know that all students in the Lake Washington School District… Continue reading

No reason to delay | Letter

I’m so bloody tired of this stupid talking point of “impeachment doesn’t… Continue reading

Critical time for the planet | Letter

This is in response to Mr. Eirich’s letter on May 17 regarding… Continue reading

A step backward | Letter

Rep. Suzan DelBene announced in her email newsletter that she “proudly voted”… Continue reading

A tone deaf Legislature | Letter

The headline should have been “Legislators stole $900 M for the affluent… Continue reading

Changing habits | Letter

Thank you for including the waste reduction article in the May 10… Continue reading

On constitutional taxes | Letter

Is this new graduated state real estate excise tax (REET) constitutional? The… Continue reading

Response to pesticide use | Letter

Dear Kirkland community members, We are aware that some community members have… Continue reading

Thanks Fire Station 21 | Letter

Thanks to the firefighters at Forbes Creek Station 21 who went beyond… Continue reading

Vote for Falcone | Letter

I am writing to endorse Amy Falcone enthusiastically for Kirkland City Council… Continue reading

Kudos to Kunkler | Letter

Kudos to Kirkland Reporter’s Aaron Kunkler for two fascinating climate articles. “Human… Continue reading

Are pesticides needed? | Letter

Ms. Mayor, We are residents of Holmes Point for several years now… Continue reading