Proposition 1 will focus on property crimes | Letter

Kirkland is proposing an important measure to advance public safety services in the city. The measure contains several items that specifically address safety concerns we have heard from the community. One such proposal is the establishment of a police pro-act unit to help solve property crimes. A pro-act unit and the hiring of additional patrol officers were two of several important recommendations identified in our Police Strategic Plan, which guides investments to address the city’s long-term public safety needs.

Since 2010, Kirkland has added 34 police officers and $9.2 million in funding to the department in response to annexation and the continued growth of our city, but we continue to be unable to allocate enough dedicated, on-going funding to reconstitute the pro-act unit that we had to eliminate during the Great Recession. Kirkland’s Proposition 1 will provide that funding.

With most of our on-duty police officers dedicated to responding to 911 calls in a reactive manner and our small detective squad focused on important person crimes, there is little additional time or resources to focus on property crimes. At the same time, largely due to the growing opioid epidemic, property crimes like home burglaries, vehicle break-ins, shoplifting, mail theft and identity theft are on the rise throughout our region. A proactive (pro-act) police unit will be able to focus on trends or commonalities in property crimes and provide the needed capabilities to begin a community-focused preventive policing program, while also coordinating with other jurisdictions to investigate regional rings of property thieves that travel from one city to the next.

Given the increasing need to address property crimes and the outstanding success of the previous pro-act unit, we believe that Kirkland’s Proposition 1 is fundamental to maintaining the quality of life for our city’s residents and ensures that our community invests wisely in enhancing our public safety services.

Please vote for yes on Kirkland’s Proposition 1 on your November ballot.

Penny Sweet, Toby Nixon, Jon Pascal

City of Kirkland Council Public Safety Committee

Letter submitted using no city resources

More in Letters to the Editor

Raves for U.S. Postal Service | Letter

Thanks for the passionate service you and your crew delivered last week.… Continue reading

Funding solution | Letter

Easy way to get rid of King County funding struggles: get rid… Continue reading

Thank you Kirkland residents | Letter

Thank you Kirkland residents I am writing to thank Kirkland residents for… Continue reading

Neighborhood parking | Letter

We are all in favor of developing Kirkland for the better. However,… Continue reading

Kiwanis tree lot a huge success | Letter

The Kirkland community and surrounding neighborhoods came through once again this year… Continue reading

Thank you Rep. DelBene | Letter

The Building Our Largest Dementia (BOLD) Infrastructure for Alzheimer’s Act has just… Continue reading

A challenge to readers | Letter

[To Samantha Pak] I enjoyed your Windows and Mirrors story in the… Continue reading

Fraudster-in-Chief | Letter

In October 2016, a neighbor explained to me he was supporting then-presidential-candidate… Continue reading

A missed opportunity | Letter

Your article (“Let’s talk about race,” Bothell-Kenmore Reporter, Dec. 14) missed an… Continue reading

United we stand — divided we fall | Letter

I can’t really believe that there are people that believe if you… Continue reading

One way to address homelessness | Letter

Why is Seattle’s homelessness problem getting worse not better? Some people are… Continue reading

Innocent until proven guilty | Letter

Yes, today’s world is truly frightening. We are now living in a… Continue reading