New distracted driving law will have police all up in your business | Letter

Don’t eat while driving. Don’t put makeup on while driving. Don’t text while driving. Don’t watch a video while driving. Don’t read while driving. Not even if stopped at a light or stop sign. (It’s legal if you pull over to do any of these things.)

It’s not a crime, but a civil infraction, like a speeding ticket. Now, you’ll get a DUI-E: “driving under the influence of electronics” ticket. The fine is $136.

It’s already been the law that holding a phone and talking on it (except for 911 calls), and hugging or embracing a passenger while driving are unlawful. But this law goes farther than any other in the nation as Big Brother is now in your passenger seat!

Eating or shaving while driving are secondary offenses with only a $30 fine. A secondary offense is one that an officer can’t pull you over for, if that’s all you’re doing wrong. There has to also be a primary (more serious) offense committed, then they can tack this secondary one on. Here, secondary offenses are all the non-electronic things one can do behind the wheel.

This new law expands the opportunity for police officers to make pretextual stops. What’s a pretextual stop? It’s a false reason for stopping a driver. It’s where an officer pulls you over for an alleged minor infraction, but is really trying to bag you for DUI, drugs or something else.

I understand the safety concern about texting while driving, but we already have negligent and reckless driving laws. These new actions that have been made civil infractions, are already against the law because they are already subsumed under our general negligence and reckless driving laws. And reckless driving carries a one-year penalty. So there’s already lots of deterrence for driving while distracted.

It shouldn’t really matter the reason one is driving dangerously, whether because one is smoking, hugging, tired, gacked up on coffee or texting, the danger is still there and our general negligent and reckless driving laws already cover it.

Hey, traffic officer, quit looking at my head, shoulders and hands, and just watch my car for unsafe driving. Please just look at my wheels, speed and blinkers, not my face, shoulders and hands.

If I’m driving unsafely, it shouldn’t really matter why. Let’s repeal this law, which treats drivers like children and invades privacy. Or at least let’s delete the all-encompassing “other distractions” section.

Jeff E. Jared

Criminal defense attorney in Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Family Literacy Night was a huge success | Letter

I am writing today to say how excited I was to read… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading