Lawyers will always be able to find inequities and we will be in court forever | Letter to the editor

Ever since the McCleary decision, where one elected judge decided the state was not fulfilling its constitutional duty regarding education, there have been newspaper articles, editorials and letters saying the state has a duty to “fully fund” or provide “equal” education to the states children.

Page one of today’s paper in an article attributed to Governor Inslee states “the state’s mandate to fully fund education.”

The Preamble to Article IX Education of the Washington State Constitution states, “It is the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste or sex.”

What is ample provision? How many different definitions are possible?

Go to the National Education Association website and look at funding by student by state. Washington compares very favorably with similar western states like Oregon, California, Colorado and Arizona. Couldn’t that comparison be a standard of “ample provision”?

That definition was left up to one elected judge, who most likely accepted campaign contributions from the teachers union and affirmed by a State Supreme Court of elected Justices who all accept campaign contributions from the teachers union. Isn’t that the definition of corruption?

If the courts have decided our duty extends to “fully fund” or provide “equal” that is not what the constitution says. That is the invention of conflicted judges.

Is there somewhere in this state where a child cannot get 12 years of publicly funded education? Is every school system equal?

No, and they never will be. Lawyers will always be able to find inequities and we will be in court forever.

For people living in a small Eastern Washington community there are a multitude of things that are not equal to living in an urban area like Seattle. If you read the complete text of Article IX there is no standards requirement other that the system be “general and uniform.”

The legislature should have proposed, a long time ago, two constitutional amendments to the people for radification.

In the first one, the election campaigns of candidates for the state Supreme Court to be totally funded by the state (it is hard to imagine a Supreme Court justice who is not appalled by the idea they can accept money from plaintiffs and defendants giving the appearance they have conflicts of interest. Why are the justices themselves not strongly demanding this of the legislature?).

In the second, we have 146 legislators in two houses that should negotiate a clear and specific definition of what “ample provision” means and that definition should not cost us $7 billion dollars to meet.

Jerry Forell,


More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

President acting disgracefully

Heartless and clueless | Letter

Most of America can’t believe we have a president that is not… Continue reading

Kudos for running thoughtful letter / Letters

Orchids to John Scannell for his well-written letter in your Oct. 5… Continue reading

Trump should stand up for public lands / Letter

When Donald Trump was elected president, sportsmen had high hopes that the… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.