Kavanaugh should be rejected | Letter

I find Republican caviling at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings baffling. For just a moment, let us set aside the allegations that the Supreme Court nominee might be a sexual predator — an attempted rapist when he was in high school. According to published reports, Kavanaugh’s criminal acts happened while he was “stumbling drunk”…and a teenager. So, to be kind, let’s also set aside that he was a stumbling drunk…minor.

Here is what I find baffling. Why would anyone in 2018 decide to disenfranchise women regarding the governance of their own bodies? Roe v. Wade has been settled law for 45 years. Women’s sexual rights, regarding contraception and abortion, should be inviolate — nobody’s business but their own. Nevertheless, Kavanaugh subverted Roe v. Wade in a recent immigrant ruling. His views are clear.

In 21st Century America, allowing “religious convictions” to supersede another person’s individual rights should be considered constitutional heresy. That’s why we have the separation of church and state — or rather, the separation of bigotry from law.

The same may be said about the individual rights of the LGBTQ community. No one should be able to superimpose narrow-minded “religious convictions” on anyone. We are not a theocracy.

Kavanaugh should be rejected because he would be an anachronism. His views are anathema to the concept of individual “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

John Scannell,

Sammamish

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

President acting disgracefully

Kudos for running thoughtful letter / Letters

Orchids to John Scannell for his well-written letter in your Oct. 5… Continue reading

Trump should stand up for public lands / Letter

When Donald Trump was elected president, sportsmen had high hopes that the… Continue reading

Proposition 1 will focus on property crimes | Letter

Kirkland is proposing an important measure to advance public safety services in… Continue reading

Kavanaugh should be rejected | Letter

I find Republican caviling at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings baffling. For just… Continue reading

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.