Response to ‘Kirkland’s future’ letter | Letter to the editor

A letter about the Houghton/Everest neighborhood.

The letter to the editor written on December 27 entitled “Council members stand up for common sense and Kirkland’s future” offered a somewhat-rosy and overly-laudatory view of what has been, in truth, a long and painful process in the re-zoning of our neighborhood’s little shopping centers.

Members of both the Houghton and Everest neighborhoods who turned out by the hundreds to city council, planning commission and community meetings to protest the re-zone might also take issue with that letter, as may the Houghton Community Council who denied the re-zone’s additional height and density within their jurisdiction.

Never has an issue come before a neighborhood so many times and been so widely opposed to and stil passed in spite of near-unanimous community resistance. While the council members may have been well-intentioned, they did not stand up for common sense, or a widely shared vision of our neighborhood’s future. They acted precipitously and recklessly, unilaterally imposing additional density, height and traffic on a neighborhood both choking on current volumes and fearful of the oncoming flood soon to pour forth from Kirkland Urban.

A neighborhood shopping center served by two narrow streets and a single intersection (already at Level of Service “F”) cannot possibly be improved by a nine-fold increase in density and traffic originating from that very intersection.

Based on a process defined by the city, the planning commission developed recommendations of a three-story height limit and many other community considerations. The city council decided that this fully considered recommendation didn’t align with their own views, and at the end of a grueling public planning process, where options and alternatives were discussed and evaluated, the council chose to override their commission’s recommendations.

The council heard, but elected to not listen to, the repeated testimony of transportation engineers, educators fearful of impacts to the schools served by these two streets, business and community leaders and hundreds of residents speaking in favor of patience and wisdom. We wanted the council to simply wait – until the impacts of several large developments currently under construction could be fairly understood.

The council and the city’s planning staff wanted additional density for these property owners very badly, and has wanted it for some time now. Over the past six years they’ve offered higher-density rezone options as “technical corrections,” “simple updates” to the zoning language, (a nine-fold increase in density is not a simple update), and as the inevitable path of progress. Well, it appears that it was inevitable – but we’re not sure it’s progress. And it’s sure not common sense.

Steve and Lisa Cox,

Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

President acting disgracefully

Heartless and clueless | Letter

Most of America can’t believe we have a president that is not… Continue reading

Kudos for running thoughtful letter / Letters

Orchids to John Scannell for his well-written letter in your Oct. 5… Continue reading

Trump should stand up for public lands / Letter

When Donald Trump was elected president, sportsmen had high hopes that the… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.