Commuter rail line would be insanity

Dear Editor,

Dear Editor,

Many of our elected officials are being persuaded that this improbable scheme (commuter rail line along the BNSF rail corridor) may actually work. The truth is that this plan would be a disaster. It will not solve any of our traffic problems and most likely will make them worse. The reasons are fairly obvious to anyone who looks closely at a map and understands a little history.

A century ago, the Eastside was a mining and shipbuilding center. The railway was built to haul freight and supplies to and from the mines and shipyards. That’s why the line does not travel in a straight line but meanders, especially through Kirkland.

A century ago the line swung through wooded, sparsely populated areas. That’s not the case today, where the railroad tracks pass through densely populated communities — literally past the backyards of hundreds of residents, past schools and across busy intersections.

To run a commuter train through these areas every half hour, morning and evening, is the essence of insanity. It is further craziness to think that a hiking and biking trail could co-exist alongside a roaring railroad.

If a rail line is to be built at all, the only logical, efficient and practical choice would be along Interstate 5.

Let’s use some common sense and let’s have some vision. Let’s return to the original concept of a hiking and biking trail similar to the Burke-Gilman and Sammamish trails. It is a great opportunity for the Port of Seattle and King County to hand down a wonderful legacy for future generations.

~Anthony Cresci, Kirkland

More in Letters to the Editor

Family Literacy Night was a huge success | Letter

I am writing today to say how excited I was to read… Continue reading

Global warming and Drive Throughs

Why don’t we hear anything about busy drive througs for coffee, fast food, drug stores and banking?

Private schools are not a solution to mass shootings | Letter

This letter is a response to “Don’t ban guns, ban government schools”.

A modest debate about transparency | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident probes Rep. Springer’s support of SB 6617.

Who speaks for me? | Letter to the editor

The Kirkland resident recently attended a town hall meeting.

It’s time to demonstrate that progress is possible | Letter to the editor

A Kirkland resident is concerned about the use of a recent image in an editorial page cartoon.

Most recipients of public eduction don’t become killers | Letter to the editor

A North Bend resident responds to “Don’t ban guns, ban goverment schools.”

Ask Sen. Cantwell to cosponsor legislation to remove financial cancer screening barrier | Letter to the editor

A letter asking Sen. Maria Cantwell to cosponsor the Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act this year.

You can’t have a shooting without first having a gun | Letter to the editor

A letter in response to a letter about banning public schools to prevent school shootings.

Totem Lake Bridge is result of many years of public input | Letter to the editor

Recently the Kirkland Reporter published a letter to the editor voicing concern… Continue reading